IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbl/journl/v27y2024i4p106-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key factors influencing the implementation of virtual reality in employee training

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Kristl Volfova

    (University of West Bohemia)

  • Dana Egerova

    (University of West Bohemia)

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is rapidly becoming more popular and accessible. With the growing popularity of its use in the corporate sphere, there are already a number of publications that focus on adapting this modern technology to employee training. Unfortunately, they only focus on certain areas and lack a comprehensive view. This study focused on this research gap and is one of the first (and in the Czech Republic, the very first) studies investigating the key factors influencing the implementation of VR in employee training. The Delphi method was implemented using a total of 22 deliberately selected experts according to pre-selected criteria to ensure sufficient and relevant data. The Delphi method was conducted in 3 rounds, and 59 factors were obtained, which were divided into positive and negative, at the same time, in both these areas, the factors were categorized into 5 dimensions, which were determined based on the modified Khan’s framework. In the analysis of the third round, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was calculated for each group. This study represents a significant contribution to the research on virtual reality as a tool for employee training. Moreover, the findings of the study are beneficial for companies, managers and human resources managers in terms of successfully implementing virtual reality into employee training.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Kristl Volfova & Dana Egerova, 2024. "Key factors influencing the implementation of virtual reality in employee training," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 27(4), pages 106-120, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:27:y:2024:i:4:p:106-120
    DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2024-5-022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2024-5-022
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15240/tul/001/2024-5-022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belton, Ian & MacDonald, Alice & Wright, George & Hamlin, Iain, 2019. "Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 72-82.
    2. Dana Ichim Somogyi, 2020. "The Educational Dimension of the Human Capital," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 390-394, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xi Zhang & Te Zhang & Xin Wei & Zhanpeng Xiao & Weiwen Zhang, 2024. "Reducing potential dual-use risks in synthetic biology laboratory research: a dynamic model of analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Jinyi Hu, 2023. "Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Haifeng Luo & Bor-Shuenn Chiou, 2021. "Framing the Hierarchy of Cultural Tourism Attractiveness of Chinese Historic Districts under the Premise of Landscape Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Chang, Victor & Liu, Ben S.C. & Sudharshan, D. & Xu, Qianwen Ariel, 2021. "Towards an effective negotiation modeling: Investigating transboundary disputes with cases of lower possibilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Chen, Kaihua & Ren, Zhipeng & Mu, Shijun & Sun, Tara Qian & Mu, Rongping, 2020. "Integrating the Delphi survey into scenario planning for China's renewable energy development strategy towards 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Rabia Bashir & Aymen Sajjad & Shahid Bashir & Khawaja Fawad Latif & Saman Attiq, 2021. "Project Managers’ Competencies in International Development Projects: A Delphi Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    7. Jiajian Huang & Longfei Li & Peng Jiang & Siqi Zhang, 2024. "DEMATEL-Based ANP Model for Identifying Critical Indicators in Sustainable Emergency Material Reserve Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Drew, Mark & Crase, Lin, 2023. "‘More Crop per Drop’ and water use efficiency in the National Water Policy of Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    9. Kluge, Ulrike & Ringbeck, Jürgen & Spinler, Stefan, 2020. "Door-to-door travel in 2035 – A Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Rengarajan, Srinath & Moser, Roger & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan, 2021. "Strategy tools in dynamic environments – An expert-panel study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    11. Mauksch, Stefanie & von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Gordon, Theodore J., 2020. "Who is an expert for foresight? A review of identification methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Akartuna, Eray Arda & Johnson, Shane D. & Thornton, Amy, 2022. "Preventing the money laundering and terrorist financing risks of emerging technologies: An international policy Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Marcelo Werneck Barbosa & José M. Cansino, 2022. "A Water Footprint Management Construct in Agri-Food Supply Chains: A Content Validity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Anna-Maria Fontrier & Bregtje Kamphuis & Panos Kanavos, 2024. "How can health technology assessment be improved to optimise access to medicines? Results from a Delphi study in Europe," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(6), pages 935-950, August.
    16. Seddigh, Mohammad Reza & Targholizadeh, Aida & Shokouhyar, Sajjad & Shokoohyar, Sina, 2023. "Social media and expert analysis cast light on the mechanisms of underlying problems in pharmaceutical supply chain: An exploratory approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Belton, Ian & Wright, George & Sissons, Aileen & Bolger, Fergus & Crawford, Megan M. & Hamlin, Iain & Taylor Browne Lūka, Courtney & Vasilichi, Alexandrina, 2021. "Delphi with feedback of rationales: How large can a Delphi group be such that participants are not overloaded, de-motivated, or disengaged?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    18. Beiderbeck, Daniel & Frevel, Nicolas & von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Schmidt, Sascha L. & Schweitzer, Vera M., 2021. "The impact of COVID-19 on the European football ecosystem – A Delphi-based scenario analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    19. Fontrier, Anna-Maria & Kamphuis, Bregtje W. & Kanavos, Panos, 2023. "How can health technology assessment be improved to optimise access to medicines? Results from a Delphi study in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120537, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Isabela Caroline de Sousa & Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes & Walter Leal Filho & João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio & Rosley Anholon, 2024. "A Delphi–Fuzzy Delphi Study on SDGs 9 and 12 after COVID-19: Case Study in Brazil," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Delphi method; employee training; modern technologies; enterprises; Khan’s framework; Industry 4.0;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:27:y:2024:i:4:p:106-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vendula Pospisilova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hflibcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.