IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00011/v2y2024i1p12-23d415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Performance of ESG ETFs vis-à-vis non-ESG ETFs in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Gerasimos G. Rompotis

    (Department of Economics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece)

Abstract

The performance of ETFs in Hong Kong that apply environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria to make their investment decisions is examined in this study. The performance of these ETFs is assessed against the performance of competitive non-ESG ETFs. The study period spans from 1/12/2022 to 29/2/2024. From a methodological perspective, raw returns, tracking errors and risk-adjusted returns are computed. Raw returns are computed in percentage terms with daily close trade prices. Tracking error is calculated as the difference in daily returns between ETFs and Hang Seng Index, which is used as a proxy for the entire stock market of Hong Kong. Risk-adjusted returns include Sharpe, Treyor, Modigliani & Modigliani, and Information Ratios. A simple regression model is applied too, via which the daily excess return of each ETF, that is the return above the risk-free rate, is regressed on the corresponding return of the market index. The empirical results indicate that the ESG ETFs clearly underperform their non-ESG peers, also being a little riskier and more expensive than them. In particular, the average daily return of ESG ETFs is equal to -0.058%, while the respective return of non-ESG ETFs is slightly better at -0.033%. At the cumulative level, the average return of ESG ETFs is equal to -19.22%, while the respective return of the non-ESG ETFs amounts to -12.41%. When it comes to risk, the ESG group presents an average measure of 1.572%, whereas the non-ESG group has an average risk of 1.490%. In regard to expenses, the average management fee of the ESG ETFs is equal to 0.18%, while the average management fee of the non-ESG peers is 0.09%.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerasimos G. Rompotis, 2024. "The Performance of ESG ETFs vis-à-vis non-ESG ETFs in Hong Kong," Climate Economics and Finance, Anser Press, vol. 2(1), pages 12-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00011:v:2:y:2024:i:1:p:12-23:d:415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/cef/2/1/7/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/cef/2/1/7
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00011:v:2:y:2024:i:1:p:12-23:d:415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.