IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00010/v2y2023i3p1-15d244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers’ attitude towards meat brands: Evidence from pork products in Guangzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Fafa (Monica) Yan

    (Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China)

  • Xi Ouyang

    (College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China)

  • Wen’e Qi

    (College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the factors influencing consumers’ cognitive attitude towards the brands of products during their consumption willingness, behaviors and choices. Taking pork brands as an example, this study conducts a questionnaire by using a random sampling method in 165 farmers’ meat markets and 54 supermarkets in Tianhe District, Yuexiu District, Liwan District, the representative districts in Guangzhou city in China, and obtains 1,050 valid observations of the pork consumers. The empirical results via a logit regression show that the factors significantly enhance consumers’ brand cognitive attitude include younger age; lower perception of product safety; less cognition of green food, frailer awareness of fresh, cold, and frozen meats, as well as weaker ability to identify a specific product. Also, stronger consumers’ brand attitude results from larger amount of money spent in a single purchase, stronger cognition of nuisance-free food, and higher identification of different types of pork meats.

Suggested Citation

  • Fafa (Monica) Yan & Xi Ouyang & Wen’e Qi, 2023. "Consumers’ attitude towards meat brands: Evidence from pork products in Guangzhou, China," Review of Economic Assessment, Anser Press, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00010:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:1-15:d:244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/rea/2/3/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/rea/2/3/16
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00010:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:1-15:d:244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.