IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2020i5p84-99,100-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade policy and economic growth in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Adeniyi Ì. Afolabi
  • Kafilat A. Sotan
  • Shakirat O. Salahudeen

Abstract

This study examines the effect of trade policy on Nigeria’s economic growth and uses annual data spanning from 1983 to 2018. The Augmented Dickey-Fuller test revealed that the variables employed have a mixed order of integration (i(0), i(1)). Thereafter, an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) technique was employed because it suits the outcome of the pre-estimation test. A cointegration test among the variables was conducted using the ARDL bound test technique. The ARDL estimates showed that the adjusted trade ratio and the price-based variables have a positive impact on the GDP in both the short and the long run. The impulse response function for the estimated ARDL model was computed in order to confirm the accuracy of the Bound testing result. Interestingly, the findings remained robust when the potential effect of the trade policy was accounted for using the impulse response function (IRF) (see the Appendix). The IRF showed dynamically that the GDP responded positively to the trade policy at a higher horizon contrary to the short run estimate, thereby giving more credibility to the result of the ARDL which was being transformed by the IRF. The dynamic responses made it possible to find out that the GDP responded positively and negatively to trade policy, but that the accumulated (long run) effect was positive. The conclusion was reached that in Nigeria the adjusted trade ratio was procyclical while the price-based mechanism was countercyclical throughout the scope of study. The suggestion was made that the policy makers should adopt policies that can promote international trade and innovations, and can shut out any form of black market premium that may cause distortions.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeniyi Ì. Afolabi & Kafilat A. Sotan & Shakirat O. Salahudeen, 2020. "Trade policy and economic growth in Nigeria," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 84-99,100-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2020:i:5:p:84-99,100-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://etj.iki.bas.bg/storage/app/uploads/public/629/9b9/31a/6299b931af2cd899693252.pdf
    Download Restriction: Fee access (Bulgarian)

    File URL: https://etj.iki.bas.bg/storage/app/uploads/public/62f/67c/4f5/62f67c4f58cde172335437.pdf
    Download Restriction: Fee access (English)
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edwards, Sebastian, 1998. "Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(447), pages 383-398, March.
    2. Chris Edmond & Virgiliu Midrigan & Daniel Yi Xu, 2015. "Competition, Markups, and the Gains from International Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(10), pages 3183-3221, October.
    3. Muhammad Shahbaz Akmal & Qazi Masood Ahmad & Mohsin Hussain Ahmad & Muhammad Sabihuddin Butt, 2007. "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Trade Liberalization and Poverty Reduction: A Case for Pakistan," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 99-118, Jan-Jun.
    4. repec:lje:journl:v:1:y:2007:i:1:p:99-118 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Steve Dowrick & Jane Golley, 2004. "Trade Openness and Growth: Who Benefits?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 38-56, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olufemi Samuel Adegboyo & Sunday Anderu Keji & Oluwadamilola Tosin Fasina, 2021. "The impact of government policies on Nigeria economic growth (case of fiscal, monetary and trade policies)," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rangan Gupta & Lardo Stander & Andrea Vaona, 2023. "Openness and growth: Is the relationship non‐linear?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3071-3099, July.
    2. Pacheco-López, Penélope & Thirlwall, Anthony, 2009. "Has Trade Liberalisation in Poor Countries Delivered the Promises Ecpected?," Panorama Económico, Escuela Superior de Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, vol. 0(08), pages 7-34, primer se.
    3. Anton Gerunov, 2014. "Openness and Growth : An Empirical Investigation on a Panel of Countries over the Period 1999–2009," Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria, vol. 12(1), pages 107-125, March.
    4. Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2010. "Why Have Economic Reforms in Mexico Not Generated Growth?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1005-1027, December.
    5. repec:grm:ecoyun:201616 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dong-Hyeon Kim, 2011. "Trade, growth and income," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 677-709, July.
    7. Emilie Kinfack & Lumengo Bonga‐Bonga, 2023. "The growth effect of trade openness on African countries: Evidence from using an instrumental variable panel smooth transition model," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 366-379, April.
    8. Dang, D Anh, 2010. "Trade Liberalization and Institutional Quality: Evidence from Vietnam," MPRA Paper 26346, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 31 Aug 2010.
    9. Philémon Votsoma & Votsoma Djekna & Itchoko Motande Mondjeli Mwa Ndjokou, 2024. "Trade openness and economic growth in the Central African Economic and Monetary Community: Is a review of the empirical evidence worthwhile? [Ouverture commerciale et croissance économique dans la ," Post-Print hal-04560475, HAL.
    10. Haq, Munshi Masudul, 2008. "Growth and openness: empirical evidence from Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 35732, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Aliyev, Khatai, 2014. "Expected Macroeconomic Impacts of the Accession to WTO on Azerbaijan Economy: Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 55096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Maoguo Wu & Xierui Han, 2022. "Influence of Economic Openness on Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China’s Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Dong-Hyeon Kim & Shu-Chin Lin, 2012. "Trade and income at different stages of economic development," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 409-421, February.
    14. Dong-Hyeon Kim & Shu-Chin Lin, 2009. "Trade and Growth at Different Stages of Economic Development," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(8), pages 1211-1224.
    15. A. P. Thirlwall, 2013. "Economic Growth in an Open Developing Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15208.
    16. Redmond, Trumel & Nasir, Muhammad Ali, 2020. "Role of natural resource abundance, international trade and financial development in the economic development of selected countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Nam, Hyun-Jung & Ryu, Doojin, 2024. "Does trade openness promote economic growth in developing countries?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Manwa, Farai & Wijeweera, Albert, 2016. "Trade liberalisation and economic growth link: The case of Southern African Custom Union countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 12-21.
    19. Wei, Shang-Jin & Wu, Yi, 2001. "Globalization and Inequality: Evidence from within China," CEPR Discussion Papers 3088, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Jose Asturias & Manuel García-Santana & Roberto Ramos, 2019. "Competition and the Welfare Gains from Transportation Infrastructure: Evidence from the Golden Quadrilateral of India," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(6), pages 1881-1940.
    21. Mare Sarr & Erwin Bulte & Chris Meissner & Tim Swanson, 2011. "On the looting of nations," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 353-380, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2020:i:5:p:84-99,100-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.