IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2007i7p144-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Institutional Distancing from the Classicism

Author

Listed:
  • Tsvetan Kotsev

Abstract

Criticism of the fundamental classical postulates is the main focus of attention of the institutional theory. In their works, a number of representatives of the institutionalism have expresses their strong disagreement with the hedonistic principles of profit and loss as being the primary motivating factors guiding human behavior. The main classical concepts have developed from relatively old tendencies, which have been dominating the way of thinking in XVII - XVIII century period. Due to its strong connection with the spiritual order the classical economic, theory places the main focus on the individual rather than the group. Leading institutionalists question this view and embrace the idea, that individual's behavior can only be manifested in a social environment. This and other characteristics, present the classical theory in a static format, unable to react adequately to the dynamics of the social and economic development. Among the fiercest critics of classicism are Clarence E. Ayres and Thorstein Veblen. In this respect, the following article gives an unconventional view on some of the renowned representatives of the institutionalism with their well-grounded criticism of the classical orthodoxy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsvetan Kotsev, 2007. "The Institutional Distancing from the Classicism," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 7, pages 144-161.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2007:i:7:p:144-161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=15ffcdbd-4469-4ee8-91ec-7b2152317995&articleid=7bb8f780-6cf2-4efb-bbb5-549d58b524c0#a7bb8f780-6cf2-4efb-bbb5-549d58b524c0
    Download Restriction: Fee access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B20 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - General
    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2007:i:7:p:144-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.