Author
Listed:
- Valentin Goev
- Ognyan Simeonov
Abstract
The results presented here from an empirical study of the internal audit in the public sector of Bulgaria show that, 10 years after its legislative introduction it has received significant recognition by organisation leaders. However, there are some reserves whose dedicated use would enhance the benefit of internal audit. Still about 15% of organisation leaders have serious doubts in the efficiency of internal audits. There is a relatively low level of approval of the internal audit contribution to resolving the tasks of internal control systems in ensuring the reliability of financial and management information and achieving economies, efficacy and efficiency of operations.Similarly low is the level of appreciation of internal audit contribution to the completeness of the internal control system elements of control environment as well as of information and communication. Organisation leaders are seriously reserved about the completeness of information acquired through internal audits which indicates problems with the strategic and annual planning of operations. The timeliness of information from reports on particular audit commitments is also accounted as a problem.Approximately every one out of ten managers of organisations thinks that the findings and recommendations of the internal audit do not bear sufficient benefit to the organisation and its capability of providing competent advice is limited or absent. Some 15% of managers share the opinion that the internal audit is not unbiased or impartial and that its priorities do not correspond to the organisation’s goals.This material presents the results from a study on a variety of relations and correlations of assessments of various aspects of the activities involved in internal audit, which can serve as a basis for development and implementation of an effective strategy for its elaboration and improvement.
Suggested Citation
Valentin Goev & Ognyan Simeonov, 2017.
"Usefulness and Factors of Benefit of Internal Audits (Empirical Assessments),"
Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 41-60.
Handle:
RePEc:bas:econst:y:2017:i:1:p:41-60
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2017:i:1:p:41-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.