IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/taprar/v3y2022i2p6-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy assessment of marker recognition using ultra wide angle camera

Author

Listed:
  • Svitlana Alkhimova

    (National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»)

  • Illia Davydovych

    (National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»)

Abstract

Modern devices that support augmented reality technology are widely used in various fields of human activity, including medicine. Head mounted displays may provide an attractive alternative to traditional surgery navigation systems because allow users to stand at the first point of view and interact with objects in their surroundings naturally. Thus, the object of research in this study is recognition accuracy of fiducial markers in zones where ultra-wide angle camera distort the most. This is motivated by the need to increase user workspace for interaction with markers compare to the workspace provided with such popular augmented reality device as Microsoft HoloLens 2. In this study, the recognition accuracy is evaluated using ArUco square markers with taking into account different marker sizes and their positions in the camera view space. The marker positions include the center of the camera view space as well as such zones where lenses distort the most as top left, top right, bottom left, and bottom right corners. Obtained results show that recognition accuracy is good enough to be applicable for surgical navigation and failures referred to the distortion occurs are available in less than 0.2 % of all cases. This gives a possibility to increase workspace for interaction with markers compare to the Microsoft HoloLens 2. At the same time, the workspace for interaction could not reach the actual view space of the camera since recognition fails in cases where marker’s body is partially visible in the captured image (i. e., marker position is at the image boundaries).

Suggested Citation

  • Svitlana Alkhimova & Illia Davydovych, 2022. "Accuracy assessment of marker recognition using ultra wide angle camera," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 3(2(65)), pages 6-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:3:y:2022:i:2:p:6-10
    DOI: 10.15587/2706-5448.2022.259068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/259068/257464
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.259068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:3:y:2022:i:2:p:6-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.