IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/jetart/v2y2022i13p24-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation of digital marketing management at the enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Yuliia Tataryntseva

    (National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute")

  • Oleksandr Pushkar

    (Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics)

  • Olena Druhova

    (Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture)

  • Svitlana Osypova

    (National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute")

  • Anastasiya Makarenko

    (National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute")

  • Oleksandr Mordovtsev

    (Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture)

Abstract

The meaning of the “digital marketing management” concept that takes into account the role of customer impressions and emotional response as prerequisites for activating targeted actions is clarified. It is proved in the paper that one of the most important criteria of digital marketing management effectiveness is the formation of user impressions. The issues of digital marketing management evaluation are generalized. It was found that modern methods of economic evaluation do not take into account the emotional component of content perception. It is proposed to introduce qualitative evaluation of impressions along with quantitative methods of digital marketing management. Digital marketing formats are systematized according to the ability to track customer feedback after interacting with a particular format. It was found that the most popular formats of digital marketing in 2021 were those that take feedback into account. In particular, companies spend their budgets for SMM – 75 %, banner advertising – 71 %, and for sharing they mostly choose social networks: Facebook – 88 %, Instagram – 78 %, Google – 75 % and YouTube – 71 %. Methodical recommendations to substantiate the economic evaluation of digital marketing management are proposed. Based on the concept of impression economy, the method of assessing the impressions of users by reviewing their reactions on social networks is analyzed. SWOT analysis of user impressions is made, and it is proposed to choose digital content, which is more emotional. The proposed methodological recommendations reflect the results of the effectiveness of digital marketing management both in quantitative (assessment of absolute and relative indicators) and qualitative forms (assessment of impressions)

Suggested Citation

  • Yuliia Tataryntseva & Oleksandr Pushkar & Olena Druhova & Svitlana Osypova & Anastasiya Makarenko & Oleksandr Mordovtsev, 2022. "Economic evaluation of digital marketing management at the enterprise," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(13(116)), pages 24-30, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:2:y:2022:i:13:p:24-30
    DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2022.254485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/254485/252830
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.254485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Solntsev Sergii & Smerichevskyi Serhii & Stadnichenko Vadym & Zakryzhevska Iryna & Patlai Andrii, 2023. "Digital Marketing as a Tool for the Enterprises’ Development in the Conditions of the Global Competition," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 45(3), pages 250-257, September.
    2. Yuliia Tataryntseva & Ruslan Kryvobok, 2024. "Defining patterns in the implementation of digital marketing of innovative products in order to improve the level of financial results," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 4(13 (130)), pages 110-117, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:2:y:2022:i:13:p:24-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.