IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-07422023932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovations In The Field Of Sports Industry Management: Assessment Of The Digital Economy'S Impact On The Qualitative Development Of The Sports Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Ziming

    (Henan Institute of Science and Technology, China; Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine)

  • Tetiana Kharchenko

    (Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy has promoted industrial transformation and upgrading, brought changes to the production mode and personal consumption mode of enterprises, and the development of traditional industries are constantly being realised in a digital format. The research of current scholars mainly focuses on: the calculation of digital economy comprehensive index, it is only scientific interpretation, lack of empirical research; second, the lack of existing research on digital economy indicators, mostly only from a single perspective; and finally, the lack of analysis of regional heterogeneity of digital economy development. Methodology. In the index system weighting method is mainly divided into subjective empowerment and objective empowerment, in terms of subjective empowerment, it is based on the relative importance between the indicators by subjective judgment to give appropriate weight, such as principal component analysis, AHP; and objective empowerment is based on the original information to empower, such as cluster analysis, standard deviation, entropy and extreme method, and so forth. In the selection of measurement method, some scholars believe that the subjective weight method will be disturbed by human factors, which will bias the calculation results, and can not respond to authenticity. In view of this, this paper adopts the entropy method to measure the high-quality economic development level and digital economy development level in 31 provinces in China from 2010 to 2019. The research of current scholars mainly focuses on: the calculation of digital economy comprehensive index, it is only scientific interpretation, lack of empirical research; second, the lack of existing research on digital economy indicators, mostly only from a single perspective; and finally, the lack of analysis of regional heterogeneity of digital economy development. This paper constructs three subsystems and 11 basic indicators to construct the evaluation index of digital economy development, and three subsystems and 9 basic indicators to evaluate the high-quality development of sports industry. To explore the spatial spillover effect of digital economy development on the high-quality development of sports industry, the high-quality development of sports industry in China in 2011-2020 was taken as the explanatory variable, and the development of digital economy was taken as the explanatory variable. The purpose of the article is to build spatial measurement model three subsystems, which include 11 basic indicators to construct the evaluation index of digital economy development, and three subsystems and 9 basic indicators to evaluate the high-quality development of sports industry. The base of research is 31 provinces, municipalities, autonomous regions of China. Conclusion. First, the digital economy is innovation as the core driving force of the new economic form, and the deep fusion of sports industry can give new impetus to the development of high-quality sports industry, further promote the development of the quality of sports industry. Second, digital economy development through advanced digital technology can directly and indirectly promote the development of sports industry, digital economy and sports industry quality development have significant spatial correlation, "high-high", "low-low" agglomeration characteristics, digital economy development can significantly promote the regional sports industry development, and the quality of sports industry development is also obvious.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Ziming & Tetiana Kharchenko, 2023. "Innovations In The Field Of Sports Industry Management: Assessment Of The Digital Economy'S Impact On The Qualitative Development Of The Sports Industry," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 9(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2023:9:3:2
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-3-10-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2126/2131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2126
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-3-10-21?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viorica TURCAN & Alexandru GRIBINCEA & Iulita BIRCA, 2014. "Digital Economy – A Premise For Economic Development In The 20th Century," ECONOMY AND SOCIOLOGY: Theoretical and Scientifical Journal, Socionet;Complexul Editorial "INCE", issue 2, pages 109-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pei Zhao & Junhua Guo & Yang Wang, 2023. "How Does the Digital Economy Affect Green Development?—Evidence from 284 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Shaolun Zeng & Huili Yang, 2023. "A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Knowledge Mapping in Digital Economy Research, 1992–2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Ye, Muqing & Zeng, Wei, 2024. "Government innovation preferences, institutional fragility, and digital economic development," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 541-555.
    4. Changya Di & Decai Tang & Yifan Xu, 2023. "Impact of Digital Economy on the High-Quality Development of China’s Service Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital economy; sports industry; quality development; spatial measurement; China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • C50 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - General
    • Z21 - Other Special Topics - - Sports Economics - - - Industry Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2023:9:3:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.