IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220206411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

World Experience Of Process Quality Management Of Teacher Training In Hei

Author

Listed:
  • Tetyana Kravchenko

    (MI “Zaporizhzhia Regional Institute of Continuing Pedagogical Education” ZRC, Ukraine)

  • Iryna Saienko

    (Military Academy (Odessa), Ukraine)

Abstract

The quality of higher education is the main feature of HEI. There are several approaches to assessing the performance of educational institutions. One of the leading process approaches is based on the principles of TQM (Total Quality Management) and the requirements for quality management systems of the International Organization for Standardization ISO. The basis for assessing the quality of higher education and training, as well as the quality of HEI’s activities are educational standards. The Ukrainian standards include: state standard, industry standards, HEI’s standards. The international standards of ENQA education quality guarantees include: standards for internal quality assurance of HEI, standards for external quality assurance of HEI, the European standards for external agencies of quality assurance. There are several models of education quality management systems: model of quality management system according to the international standard ISO 9001:2000 (DSTU ISO 9001:2001); the model of the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) and its modifications for HE; the model of the Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS) of the University of Twente (Netherlands); model of the Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU); Belgian-Dutch model (Expertgroep HBO); Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award in the field of education; benchmarking model for Australian universities and others. According to most researchers, there are some advantages in creating a quality management system of higher education institution in the context of the TQM ideology, which involves the application of process and systemic principles. The comparative characterization of factors influencing the quality of education in comparison with the principles of TQM, EFQM’s criteria and the requirements of the international standard ISO 9001:2000 and interdependent business processes. In the universities of the USA, France, Great Britain and other developed countries, the problems of general process quality management are considered in three planes. The study of the positive experience of developed countries, HEIs of which are included in the world rankings, and graduates are in demand in the labor market, allows to form a mechanism for implementing the TQM principles both at the state and regional levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetyana Kravchenko & Iryna Saienko, 2020. "World Experience Of Process Quality Management Of Teacher Training In Hei," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2020:6:4:11
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-4-90-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/862/913
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/862
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-4-90-97?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Najm A. Najm & A.S. H. Yousif & Jasser A. Al-Ensour, 2017. "Total quality management (TQM), organizational characteristics and competitive advantage," Journal of Economic and Financial Studies (JEFS), LAR Center Press, vol. 5(4), pages 12-23, August.
    2. Zaggl, Michael A., 2017. "Manipulation of explicit reputation in innovation and knowledge exchange communities: The example of referencing in science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 970-983.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharifa Aldarmaki & Bahari Yaakub Kamarul, 2022. "Measurements of Organizational Excellence - Development of Holistic Excellence Practices for Free Zones in Dubai," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, January -.
    2. Pfeil, Katharina & Necker, Sarah & Feld, Lars P., 2023. "Compliance management in research institutes: Boon or bane?," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 23/1, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    3. Najm A. Najm & A.S. H. Yousif & Jasser A. Al-Ensour, 2017. "Total quality management (TQM), organizational characteristics and competitive advantage," Journal of Economic and Financial Studies (JEFS), LAR Center Press, vol. 5(4), pages 12-23, August.
    4. Petersen, Alexander M. & Pan, Raj K. & Pammolli, Fabio & Fortunato, Santo, 2019. "Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1855-1865.
    5. Petersen, Alexander M., 2019. "Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    6. Ann Hipp & Udo Ludwig & Jutta Günther, 2021. "Unable to innovate or just bad circumstances? Comparing the innovation system of a state-led and market-based economy," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2111, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    7. Yoon, Hyungseok & Belkhouja, Mustapha & Wei, Yingqi & Lee, Sangho, 2021. "Born to be similar? Global isomorphism and the emergence of latecomer business schools," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    8. Wuestman, Mignon L. & Hoekman, Jarno & Frenken, Koen, 2019. "The geography of scientific citations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1771-1780.
    9. Martin Szomszor & David A. Pendlebury & Jonathan Adams, 2020. "How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 1119-1147, May.
    10. Zaggl, Michael A. & Pottbäcker, Judith, 2021. "Facilitators and inhibitors for integrating expertise diversity in innovation teams: The case of plasmid exchange in molecular biology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    11. Maurice Poirrier & Sebastián Moreno & Gonzalo Huerta-Cánepa, 2021. "Robust h-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 1969-1981, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    process approach; ISO standards; TQM concept; HEI’s quality management models; PDCA Deming cycle; ?FQM model; education quality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2020:6:4:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.