IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/3seasj/2661-515020201212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons And Consequences Of Hidden Entrepreneurship In Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Oleh Holovko

    (Black Sea Research Institute of Economy and Innovation, Odesa, Ukraine)

  • Ihor Biriukov

    (Black Sea Research Institute of Economics and Innovation, Odesa, Ukraine)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the essence, causes and consequences of hidden entrepreneurship in Ukraine. The shadowing of economic activity hinders the development of the country’s competitiveness, complicates integration into the European community, negatively affects the growth of social living standards of the population. In Ukraine, there is no single approach to the interpretation of the concept of "hidden entrepreneurship". In most approaches, this phenomenon is associated with illegal business. In some studies, hidden entrepreneurship is associated with the shadow economy. This creates discrepancies in the indicators of the level of the shadow economy in Ukraine’s GDP, which distorts the reflection of the real state of threat to the effective development of the economy. The problems of shadowing economic activity have been studied for a long time. At the same time, deepening the understanding of the causal links between hidden entrepreneurship and the prospects of economic development in modern Ukraine requires more detail. The methodological basis of this work is the synthesis of general scientific methods of theoretical and empirical research (method of cognition, analysis and synthesis, generalization and systematization of information). Results. One of the main parameters of hidden entrepreneurship is the focus on the conscious reflection of performance. Thus, informal economic activity, which is mainly related to housekeeping, small services, irregular work, etc., acquires signs of deliberate concealment as a result of legal production and sale of unregistered goods and services. Carrying out economic operations prohibited by law turns economic activity into illegal or criminal. Thus, each subsequent type of hidden business receives additional characteristics regarding the legality of economic transactions. We identify four main groups of reasons for the emergence of hidden entrepreneurship: economic, socio-political, administrative, moral and ethical, psychological reasons. Hidden entrepreneurship provides employment to the part of the country’s population that has no sources of income (pensioners, pregnant women, people with no work experience, youth, minors, etc.). In addition, hidden business goods and services are affordable for socially vulnerable groups, partially reducing the social tensions that exist in society. Practical implications. Given that the level of the shadow sector in Ukraine is quite high (over 30% of GDP) now, its impact on economic development is negative. Therefore, identifying the root causes, as well as awareness of the negative consequences of further development of hidden entrepreneurship for the national economy should become the foundation for the transformation of the institutional environment in the country. Understanding these implications will identify the most promising ways to reduce the level of the shadow economy and promote the use of the positive effects of hidden entrepreneurship to develop the necessary incentives for entrepreneurs. Value/originality. The use of comprehensive analysis allows to identify the main problems of hidden entrepreneurship, taking into account the specifics of its manifestation in modern conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleh Holovko & Ihor Biriukov, 2020. "Reasons And Consequences Of Hidden Entrepreneurship In Ukraine," Three Seas Economic Journal, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 1(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:3seasj:2661-5150:2020:1:2:12
    DOI: 10.30525/2661-5150/2020-2-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/threeseas/article/view/890/942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/threeseas/article/view/890
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2661-5150/2020-2-12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anon, 2002. "The Economy of Influence," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1331-1332, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercy W. Mwangi & Amos G. Njuguna & George O. Achoki, 2019. "Relationship between corruption and capital flight in Kenya: 1998-2018," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(5), pages 237-250, September.
    2. Zhen Wang & Chao Chen & Zhenhai Liu, 2008. "The Linkage Between the Fuel Oil Markets of Singapore and China," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 76-83, March.
    3. Bennedsen, Morten & Feldmann, Sven E., 2006. "Informational lobbying and political contributions," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(4-5), pages 631-656, May.
    4. Zhou, H. & Uhlaner, L.M., 2009. "Knowledge Management in the SME and its Relationship to Strategy, Family Orientation and Organization Learning," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-026-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. repec:rnp:rpaper:repkz1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    7. Engelbert Stockhammer, 2015. "Rising inequality as a cause of the present crisis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(3), pages 935-958.
    8. Panagiotis Artelaris & Yannis Tsirbas, 2018. "Anti-austerity voting in an era of economic crisis: Regional evidence from the 2015 referendum in Greece," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 589-608, June.
    9. Debraj Ray, 2010. "Uneven Growth: A Framework for Research in Development Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 24(3), pages 45-60, Summer.
    10. Christian Salas, 2019. "Persuading policy-makers," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(4), pages 507-542, October.
    11. Arata, Yoshiyuki & Mundt, Philipp, 2019. "Topology and formation of production input interlinkages: Evidence from Japanese microdata," BERG Working Paper Series 152, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
    12. Luigi Guiso & Michael Haliassos & Tullio Jappelli, 2003. "Household stockholding in Europe: where do we stand and where do we go? [‘Limited market participation and volatility of assets prices’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 18(36), pages 123-170.
    13. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    14. Tokunaga, Masahiro, 2020. "Regime Change and Environmental Reform: A Systematic Review of Research on Central and Eastern Europe," CEI Working Paper Series 2019-10, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    15. Ikudayisi, Adesola & Okoruwa, Victor O., 2021. "Urban Differential Effects on Food Demand in Nigeria," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315142, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2016. "Voting and Popularity," CREMA Working Paper Series 2016-08, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    17. Poitras, Geoffrey, 2023. "Cobweb Theory, Market Stability, And Price Expectations," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 137-161, March.
    18. Jeffrey Wagner, 2007. "Plato's Republic and liberal economic education for the twenty-first century," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 1(2), pages 1-10.
    19. Jinyoung Kim & Sangjoon John Lee & Gerald Marschke, 2009. "International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from an Inventor-Firm Matched Data Set," NBER Chapters, in: Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment, pages 321-348, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Natalya A. Zaitseva & Valentin S. Korneevets & Elena G. Kropinova & Tatyana Yu. Kuznetsova & Ludmila V. Semenova, 2016. "Cross-border Movement of People between Russia and Poland and Their Influence on the Economy of Border Regions," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 1690-1695.
    21. Monika Banaszewska & Ivo Bischoff, 2018. "Grants-in-aid and the prospect of re-election: The impact of EU funds on mayoral elections in Poland," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201822, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    hidden entrepreneurship; shadow economy; level of the shadow economy; effects of hidden entrepreneurship; basic characteristics of hidden entrepreneurship;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:3seasj:2661-5150:2020:1:2:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.