IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/azn/journl/y2015ixvip171-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Le problème du passage de l’un au Multiple / The Problem of the Passage from one to multiple

Author

Listed:
  • Gheorghe DĂNIŞOR

    (“C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” Institute for Research in Social Studies and Humanities from Craiova, of the Romanian Academy)

Abstract

On a metaphysical level, the concept of “passage” is problematic. Therefore, in this analysis we put into question numerous times this term. The word “passage” is used because we have no other to designate this reality which, in its transition into something else, does not disappear, actually. This dificulty is felt, it seems, to Hegel, because neither he failed to adequately express the paradox of the passage that does not pass. The solution can come from the deduction of this paradox significance from the Greek meaning of “theoria” (contemplation, sophia), which contains in itself two terms that mean the same thing: theo-passer and reo-passer, which could be expressed as the passage of the passage, ie, the location in the divine (Thea).

Suggested Citation

  • Gheorghe DĂNIŞOR, 2015. "Le problème du passage de l’un au Multiple / The Problem of the Passage from one to multiple," Anuarul Institutului de Cercetări Socio-Umane „C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopșor” (“C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” Institute for Research in Social Studies and Humanities Yearbook (CSNIPSSH Yearbook)), Institutul de Cercetări Socio-Umane „C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopșor” al Academiei Române, issue XVI, pages 171-175, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:azn:journl:y:2015:i:xvi:p:171-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://npissh.ro/ro/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/12/Le-probl%C3%A8me-du-passage-de-l%E2%80%99un-au-Multiple-The-Problem-of-the.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:azn:journl:y:2015:i:xvi:p:171-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Bărbieru (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.