IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/rmfi00/y2020v13i3p212-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk governance framework and the three lines of defence construct: A challenged self-assessment process through an activity-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Bradford

    (Chief Risk Officer, Citigroup, USA)

  • Denizkurdu, Aslihan

    (Head of Governance and Chief Operating Officer for Risk Management, Citigroup, USA)

Abstract

Since the financial crisis, there has been significant focus by international governing bodies, global regulators and management teams on enhancing corporate and risk governance practices. In international banks, a key component of this objective has been the establishment of a risk governance framework, a foundational pillar of which are the three lines of defence construct that assigns clear control and risk management responsibilities to units in an organisation. The objective of this paper is to recommend, as a best practice, a challenged selfassessment process to assess the robustness of a bank’s three lines of defence construct in light of the continuous changes in its risk profile. In this exercise, each organisational unit would selfassess its core activities against prescribed standards for front line units, control/support units (control/support), independent risk management (IRM) and internal audit. The exercise would confirm each organisational unit’s and its core activities’ placement within the lines of defence construct and determine whether required roles and responsibilities for controlling the risks generated from these activities are being carried out effectively. The exercise, challenged by IRM functions, would identify where the firm needs to establish increased IRM oversight of certain units, activities or processes or enhance the control environment around these activities. The depth, breadth and execution of the assessment exercise can be adapted to the bank’s primary goals or specific concerns related to its control environment. As the exercise is implemented periodically and matures, the bank may also choose to take a concentrated or risk-tiered approach, with certain areas periodically selected for a deeper dive, full end-to-end process review based on monitoring, thematic focus or other considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Bradford & Denizkurdu, Aslihan, 2020. "Risk governance framework and the three lines of defence construct: A challenged self-assessment process through an activity-based approach," Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 13(3), pages 212-223, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:rmfi00:y:2020:v:13:i:3:p:212-223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/5662/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/5662/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk management; risk governance; three lines of defence; challenged self-assessment process; activity-based approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • E5 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:rmfi00:y:2020:v:13:i:3:p:212-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.