IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/jdpp00/y2024v7i1p51-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical privacy: Aligning the need to breach patient confidentiality with data protection in the public interest

Author

Listed:
  • Harvey, Andrew

    (Director of Information Governance, Cyber and Compliance/Data Protection Officer, Graphnet Health Limited, UK)

Abstract

This paper takes an overview of case law legislation and professional guidance to assess when it may be acceptable for medical practitioners to breach patient confidentiality and data protection law in the public interest. It looks at the implications of making such decisions in both a positive and negative light because of what happens if confidentiality is breached in the public interest, but also the implication, on occasion, if it is not. The paper synthesises the often contradictory considerations of the Data Protection Act 2018 and UK General Data Protection Regulation with the wider implications of breaching the common law duty of confidentiality and professional guidance offered by the likes of the British Medical Association, General Medical Council and right back to the Hippocratic Oath. In doing so, it creates a framework in which it is acceptable in many circumstances to breach patient confidentiality while demonstrating that due care and attention are required to ensure the appropriate decisions are made.

Suggested Citation

  • Harvey, Andrew, 2024. "Medical privacy: Aligning the need to breach patient confidentiality with data protection in the public interest," Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 7(1), pages 51-60, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:jdpp00:y:2024:v:7:i:1:p:51-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/8931/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/8931/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    case law; confidentiality; consent; direct care; health care; public health; public interest;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jdpp00:y:2024:v:7:i:1:p:51-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.