IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/csj000/y2018v2i3p202-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing cyber security as a business risk

Author

Listed:
  • Wheeler, Evan

Abstract

The information security industry struggles to get its programmes on the enterprise stage. When an organisation has a public breach, we are quick to criticise both the CISO and executive management. Is it that management ‘just doesn’t get it’, or is the problem that we’re still not presenting in a way that resonates with the business? We can learn a lot from other risk disciplines, how they organise risk scenarios and the techniques that they use. Mature organisations rely on risk profiles, the RCSA, stress testing, control testing and the analysis of loss events to understand their risk exposure. If you want your information risk programme to be taken seriously by the business, you have to do more than just throwing around a few business terms — you need to embrace enterprise risk techniques. Structuring a cyber security programme and assessment approach similar to other risk stripes not only provides credibility, but also allows the organisation to normalise risks across domains. By adopting taxonomies that are ERM-friendly, embracing the idea of a quantifiable loss event, and helping to translate impact and frequency factors into IT terms, you will see a great improvement in business engagement and ensure that cyber security concerns receive the right focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Wheeler, Evan, 2018. "Framing cyber security as a business risk," Cyber Security: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 2(3), pages 202-210, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:csj000:y:2018:v:2:i:3:p:202-210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/2401/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/2401/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk; assessment; analysis; quantification; ERM;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:csj000:y:2018:v:2:i:3:p:202-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.