Author
Abstract
As the need for accountable marketing spending continues to grow, companies must develop sound metrics and measures of marketing’s contribution to firm profitability. The leading metric has been return on marketing investment (MROI), following the widespread adoption of ROI metrics in other parts of the organisation. However, the ROI metric in marketing is typically interpreted and used in a variety of ways, which causes ambiguity and suboptimal marketing decision making. This paper seeks to remove the ambiguity around MROI to guide better measurements and analytics aligned to financial contribution. The authors first provide a formal definition of MROI and review variations in the use of MROI that are the root cause of ambiguity in interpretation. The authors come to the conclusion that MROI estimates would be more transparently described if those providing the estimates used the following form: Our analysis measured a (total, incremental, or marginal) MROI of (scope of spending) using (valuation method) over time period. The paper proceeds to describe five case studies that illustrate the various uses of MROI, covering different marketing initiatives in different business sectors. The authors describe the important links between marketing lift metrics (such as response elasticities) and MROI. The final section of the paper focuses on the connection between MROI and business objectives. While management’s prerogative is to maximise short- and long-run profits, that is not equivalent to maximising MROI. The authors demonstrate that MROI plays a different role in the process of marketing budget setting (a marketing strategic task) versus allocating a given budget across different marketing activities (a marketing operations task). They highlight the role of setting MROI hurdle rates that recognise not only marketing’s ability to drive revenue, but also the firm’s cost of capital. The authors hope that their recommendations will help the marketing profession achieve a common understanding of how to assess and use what they believe is its most important summary productivity metric, MROI.
Suggested Citation
Farris, Paul W. & Hanssens, Dominique M. & Lenskold, James D. & Reibstein, David J., 2015.
"Marketing return on investment: Seeking clarity for concept and measurement,"
Applied Marketing Analytics: The Peer-Reviewed Journal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 1(3), pages 267-282, July.
Handle:
RePEc:aza:ama000:y:2015:v:1:i:3:p:267-282
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:ama000:y:2015:v:1:i:3:p:267-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.