IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v9y2019i3p589-598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-recognition of states as a specific sanction of public international law

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Corobana

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

This article analyses two of the most controversial institutions of public international law: the recognition/non-recognition of states and the sanction in public international law, arguing why the non-recognition of states represents one of the specific sanctions of the public international law. The purpose of this article is to bring a novelty value to the current stage of research, by analysing a specific sanction of public international law: the non-recognition of the states created by disregarding international rules, especially the jus cogens ones. Therefore, the research hypothesis of this article is as follows: the nonrecognition of states represents a specific legal sanction of public international law which intervenes as a results of the violation of some jus cogens rules in the process of creating the new state that wants its recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Corobana, 2019. "Non-recognition of states as a specific sanction of public international law," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 9(3), pages 589-598, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:589-598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An9v3/7.%20Adrian%20Corobana.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakub HANDRLICA & Gabriela PROKOPOVA & Liliija SERHIICHUK & Vladimir SHARP, 2023. "The enigma of recognition of administrative acts issued by non-recognised regimes," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 513-535, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:589-598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.