IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v12y2022i4p521-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations devoted to the Polish solution of the statutory threat of punishment for counterfeiting money or its surrogate and crimes related to such counterfeiting against the background of European solutions - de lege lata remarks and postulates de lege ferenda

Author

Listed:
  • Maciej BÅ OTNICKI

    (Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Administration, UMCS, Lublin, Bar Association in Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

The article's purpose is to present partial research results devoted to the issue of criminal liability for counterfeit money or its surrogate and crimes related to such imitation. Partial results refer to the issue of the limits of the statutory threat of criminal punishment in various European countries. The analysis presented made it possible to distinguish the models preferred by the legislator for determining the criminal sanction for the indicated crimes. Moreover, those variants of sanctions (taking into account the lower and upper limits of the threat) that are most often used in legislative practice were indicated. The considerations led to the formulation of de lege ferenda postulates in terms of modification of the Polish Criminal Law. The research uses theoretical and dogmatic methods of analyzing the legal text of criminal statutes and the comparative law method.

Suggested Citation

  • Maciej BÅ OTNICKI, 2022. "Considerations devoted to the Polish solution of the statutory threat of punishment for counterfeiting money or its surrogate and crimes related to such counterfeiting against the background of Europe," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 12(4), pages 521-537, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:521-537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An12v4/6.%20Maciej%20Blotnicki.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    limits of sanctions; imprisonment; models of responsibility; comparative approach.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:521-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.