IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v12y2022i3p399-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FinTech and Regulatory Sandbox – new challenges for the financial market. The case of the Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Simona HESEKOVA BOJMIROVA

    (Department of Financial Law, Faculty of Law, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of emerging regulatory sandboxes and FinTech in the financial markets. The choice of topic is given by i) the topicality of the selected issues and dynamic changes in the financial markets, ii) the fact that there is no flat-rate framework for operating the regulatory sandbox and innovation hub and the EU's efforts to establish a framework for the operation of the innovation hub and the regulatory sandbox build on a comparative analysis of the steps already taken in Member States' legislation. Based on the analysis of previous scientific studies focused on the issue of regulatory sandboxes, the article identifies summarizing criteria on the basis of which it approaches the analysis of the operating of the regulatory sandbox in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. The article thus reflects on the need for analysis of national approaches to the establishment of the regulatory sandbox and complements the range of scientific studies with the lack of analysis of the regulatory sandbox in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. With this approach, the article supports the possibility of using the method of horizontal comparison of national regulations of individual states in setting a transnational approach to FinTech regulations, as well as contributes to further scientific research at the international level.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona HESEKOVA BOJMIROVA, 2022. "FinTech and Regulatory Sandbox – new challenges for the financial market. The case of the Slovak Republic," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 12(3), pages 399-411, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:399-411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An12v3/6.%20Hesekova%20Bojmirova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franklin Allen & Itay Goldstein & Julapa Jagtiani & William W. Lang, 2016. "Enhancing Prudential Standards in Financial Regulations," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 49(2), pages 133-149, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophia Velez & Michael Neubert & Daphne Halkias, 2020. "Banking Finance Experts Consensus on Compliance in US Bank Holding Companies: An e-Delphi Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Franklin Allen & Itay Goldstein & Julapa Jagtiani, 2018. "The Interplay among Financial Regulations, Resilience, and Growth," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 53(2), pages 141-162, June.
    3. Ahmad Alaassar & Anne-Laure Mention & Tor Helge Aas, 2023. "Facilitating innovation in FinTech: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 33-66, January.
    4. Sophia Beckett Velez, 2021. "Idiosyncratic Viral Loss Theory: Systemic Operational Losses in Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Allen, Franklin & Jagtiani, Julapa & Goldstein, Itay, 2018. "The Interplay between Financial Regulations, Resilience, and Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 12861, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Bevilacqua, Mattia & Duygun, Meryem & Vioto, Davide, 2023. "The impact of COVID-19 related policy interventions on international systemic risk," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FinTech; regulatory sandbox; incubation models; innovation hub; the Slovak Republic; European Union.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:399-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.