IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/joasrj/v3y2013i1p35-38id3446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for Decision-Making in Survey Questionnaires Based on Likert Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Ankur Barua

Abstract

Opinion-based questionnaires on Likert scales are commonly used in assessing health care utilization, facilitating factors and barriers. There is a need to set up a cut-off point in them to arrive at a conclusion. It is also important to set up a cut-off point on overall items in Likert scale-based questionnaires used for assessing Knowledge, Attitude and Practice. In this article, we show how to formulate a tool for decision-making in survey questionnaires and readjust their cut-off points to incorporate the population variation for items containing ordinal variables. This method can be used for setting up a cut-off point to arrive at a diagnosis in a newly developed instrument with ordinal variables which does not have any gold-standard instrument for comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Ankur Barua, 2013. "Methods for Decision-Making in Survey Questionnaires Based on Likert Scale," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(1), pages 35-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:35-38:id:3446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/article/view/3446/5495
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nadeem Uz Zaman, Zainab Bibi, Sana Ur Rehman Sheikh, Abdul Raziq, 2020. "Manualizing Factor Analysis of Likert Scale Data," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 7(2), pages 56-67, October.
    2. Rybaczewska, Maria & Sparks, Leigh & Sułkowski, Šukasz, 2020. "Consumers’ purchase decisions and employer image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Javier Esclapés & Almudena Gómez & Ana Ibañez, 2021. "Flow. A Socially Responsible 3D Printed One-Handed Recorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Olawumi Dele Awolusi & Shirley Shamen Jayakody, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Employee's Retention: Evidence from the Food and Beverage Industry in the State of Qatar," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 12(4), pages 39-58.
    5. Francesca Abastante & Isabella M. Lami & Luigi La Riccia & Marika Gaballo, 2020. "Supporting Resilient Urban Planning through Walkability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:35-38:id:3446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.