IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/joasrj/v1y2011i2p57-64id3273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Communities' Perception of Parks And Reserves in Cote d'Ivoire: Do the Wanne People Consider the Monogaga Classified Forest as A Natural Patrimony

Author

Listed:
  • ADOU YAO Constant Yves
  • AKE-ASSI Emma
  • OUATTARA Djakalia
  • N’GUESSAN Kouakou Edouard

Abstract

The Parks, Reserves and Classified Forests in Côte d’Ivoire are considered as to-be-conserved national natural patrimony. Their management seldom involves the local communities who live around or inside them. Farming practices exert a continuously high pressure on forest cover. In the case of Monogaga, local people (the Wanne) were allowed to stay in the forest after it had been declared classified. After a period of conflict between the Wanne and SODEFOR, the forest management authority, SODEFOR sought to understand why the Wanne people do not consider the entire forest as a patrimony to conserve and transfer to their children. The present study addresses this question. Local communities recognized several spatial units in the Monogaga Forest. The chiefs of lineage control and guarantee access to those units. In the subdivision of SODEFOR, each zone corresponds to a precise designation: one for agriculture and another one for conservation. For SODEFOR, the forest ecosystems constitute a national patrimony to conserve while taking into accounts land rights and access to resources. For farmers, land that is inalienable and some of its resources (raphia swamp, kporo) constitute a patrimony of the lineage. In the latter case, the use of land and resources obey complexes access rules. Those traditional access rules to land and resources are still in use in Monogaga.

Suggested Citation

  • ADOU YAO Constant Yves & AKE-ASSI Emma & OUATTARA Djakalia & N’GUESSAN Kouakou Edouard, 2011. "Local Communities' Perception of Parks And Reserves in Cote d'Ivoire: Do the Wanne People Consider the Monogaga Classified Forest as A Natural Patrimony," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 1(2), pages 57-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:57-64:id:3273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/article/view/3273/5272
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:57-64:id:3273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.