IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijells/v13y2024i2p355-368id5129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the effectiveness of deductive vs. Inductive instructional approaches on learning modifiers to enhance descriptive writing skills

Author

Listed:
  • Anniejemijonafer
  • Anil Premraj

Abstract

Numerous techniques and methodologies have been explored to foster descriptive skills in the writing of second language learners. However, learners continue to struggle due to their limited ideas and vocabulary. The present experiment uses modifiers as a tool to achieve the stated objectives. The intention of this investigation is to determine the efficacy of deductive and inductive instructional methodologies in enhancing learners' descriptive writing skills with regard to modifiers. A true experimental design was employed to select two random groups of participants out of 15 groups whose English proficiency test scores exceeded the required score. A total of 135 first-year tertiary learners participated. The study employs a quantitative approach to obtain data from the experimental teams' pre- and post-test results. Using the SPSS program, a paired sample t-test and an independent sample t-test were performed as part of the statistical analysis of the data. The findings indicated that the group of students who encountered the inductive instructional method exhibited a greater frequency of modifiers in their descriptive writing compared to the group of students who got exposed to the deductive approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Anniejemijonafer & Anil Premraj, 2024. "Investigating the effectiveness of deductive vs. Inductive instructional approaches on learning modifiers to enhance descriptive writing skills," International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 13(2), pages 355-368.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:355-368:id:5129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/article/view/5129/8002
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:355-368:id:5129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.