IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v2y2012i2p358-366id763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Earnings Management, Board Independence And Audit Fees Considering The Firm's Profitability Level

Author

Listed:
  • Javad Moradi
  • Hashem Valipour
  • Zahra Pahlavan

Abstract

This study investigates the relation between earnings management, board independence and audit fees considering the firm's profitability level. Two main hypotheses have been designed by theoretical framework, and have been tested on 57 listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange during 2003 to 2009. The statistical analysis had been done by multi-variable regression analysis and one-way ANOVA analysis, too. The findings show that there is a meaningful and positive relation between earnings management and audit fees. Also, there is a meaningful and negative relation between board independence and audit fees. The results suggest that the higher the level of profitability, the higher the audit fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Javad Moradi & Hashem Valipour & Zahra Pahlavan, 2012. "Earnings Management, Board Independence And Audit Fees Considering The Firm's Profitability Level," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 2(2), pages 358-366.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:358-366:id:763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/763/1212
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rustam, Sehrish & Rashid, Kashif & Zaman, Khalid, 2013. "The relationship between audit committees, compensation incentives and corporate audit fees in Pakistan," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 697-716.
    2. Kogilavani Apadore & Thanaletchumi R. Letchumanan, 2016. "Determinants of Audit Fees among Public Listed Companies in Malaysia. A Theoretical Model," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 169-174, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:358-366:id:763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.