IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v15y2025i3p454-466id5348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of geopolitical distance on export efficiency in the transition countries

Author

Listed:
  • Trung Thanh Nguyen
  • Thuy Thi Cam Nguyen

Abstract

This study explores the impact of geopolitical distance on trade efficiency in 18 transition economies from 1990 to 2020. It examines how differences in political alignment, measured through United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) voting patterns, influence export performance. Export efficiency is defined as the ratio of actual exports to potential exports. Geopolitical distance is quantified using voting similarity scores in the UNGA. The study employs a stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to estimate export efficiency and assess the effects of geopolitical distance while controlling for economic and institutional factors. Greater geopolitical distance negatively affects export efficiency by increasing sourcing costs and input complexity. The impact varies over time and depends on the exporter’s political system, especially whether it remains a communist state, as well as the development level of trading partners. The findings underscore the importance of political alignment in trade efficiency. Transition economies with closer geopolitical ties to major trading partners tend to achieve higher export efficiency. The study offers insights for policymakers and business leaders in transition economies. To mitigate geopolitical risks, firms should diversify trade partners, while governments can pursue strategic diplomatic and trade policies to enhance market access.

Suggested Citation

  • Trung Thanh Nguyen & Thuy Thi Cam Nguyen, 2025. "Effect of geopolitical distance on export efficiency in the transition countries," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 15(3), pages 454-466.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:454-466:id:5348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/5348/8216
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:454-466:id:5348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.