IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/adprev/v12y2024i4p364-377id5207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is promotion competition responsible for local protectionism in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Le XiaoBing
  • Sarma Binti Aralas

Abstract

This study investigates the promotion competition for local protectionism in China. Since the personnel evaluation criteria in China shifted from political loyalty to economic performance, local governments strive to pursue regional tax benefits and political promotion opportunities, often adopting a range of protective measures to support the economic development of their regions. However, these actions can significantly impede the normal functioning of the market and result in local protectionism. Addressing local protectionism is crucial for accelerating the establishment of a nationally unified market characterized by fair competition and full openness. Overcoming local protectionism necessitates not only an environment conducive to fair competition, but also the active coordination of local officials. This study investigates the factors that influence local protectionism in China using the spatial econometric methods. Applying provincial panel data spanning the years 2003 to 2019, the study focuses on promotion competition among local officials that contributes to local protectionism. The results of an empirical study show that local protectionism is spatially related between regions. This means that when foreign government implements local protection policies, the local government responds with similar measures, and the level of response varies between regions. Additionally, the spatial spillover effect of promotion competition on local protectionism is found to be significant, with the impact displaying variations across different phases. The findings offer a new understanding of the issue of local protectionism.

Suggested Citation

  • Le XiaoBing & Sarma Binti Aralas, 2024. "Is promotion competition responsible for local protectionism in China?," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 12(4), pages 364-377.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:adprev:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:364-377:id:5207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5008/article/view/5207/8081
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:adprev:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:364-377:id:5207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5008/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.