Author
Listed:
- Harlida Abdul Wahab*
(Senior Lecturer, School of Law, College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok , Kedah, Malaysia)
- Nurli Yaacob
(Senior Lecturer, School of Law, College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok , Kedah, Malaysia)
- Haslinda Mohd Anuar
(Senior Lecturer, School of Law, College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)
Abstract
For a stiffer penalty, punishment for the environmental violation was generally increased from Malaysian Ringgit 10,000 to Malaysian Ringgit 100,000 and from two years to five years imprisonment twenty years ago. Although the penalties are improved, the cases of environmental pollution and violation are yet increasing. This article examines the trend of punishment for environmental violations that imposed on the corporate entities or corporations. Focusing on the case of water pollution, the observations are made to the penalty’s provisions of the Environmental Quality Act 1974 and the penalties imposed through the court judgment against the corporations. For this purpose, cases and charges of water pollution are obtained from the records of Department of Environment Malaysia. Moreover, views of the judges of the Green Court on both laws and judgments relating to penalties are acquired. The study found that: (a) there is a wide gap between the punishment imposed by law and the penalties positioned by court; (b) corporate entities are willing to pay fines; (c) courts are not ready to impose imprisonment for default of payment to the corporations or individuals within the corporations. Though addressing water pollution, the findings should be far-reaching surpassing other types of environmental pollution.
Suggested Citation
Harlida Abdul Wahab* & Nurli Yaacob & Haslinda Mohd Anuar, 2018.
"Analysing Punishment of Corporations in Water Pollution Case,"
The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 628-637:6.
Handle:
RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:628-637
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:628-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.