IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p485-488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Principle of Maintaining Citizens’ Confidence in Law and State Actions during the Practice of RF Constitutional and Statutory Courts

Author

Listed:
  • Gulnara R. Khabiboullina*

    (Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russian Federation)

  • Liliana I. Bagautdinova

    (Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russian Federation)

Abstract

This article examines the final decisions of constitutional and statutory courts in RF subjects, as well as individual decisions of RF Constitutional Court and the judicial legal positions expressed in them. Judicial practice, established on the basis of control and supervision activities of constitutional justice regional bodies, allows us to consider the principle of maintaining citizens’ confidence in the law and the actions of the state as a cross-sectoral legal principle that serves as the criterion to evaluate the constitutionality of legal norms adopted outside the powers of Russian Federation on the subjects of joint jurisdiction of Russian Federation and RF subjects. However, the close relationship between the principle of citizens’ confidence maintaining in the law and the actions of the state with the general legal principles of justice, equality, legal certainty and the recognition of a person, his rights and freedoms as the highest value makes it possible to qualify this principle as a general principle of law. According to the judicial practice of the constitutional and statutory courts of RF subjects, the principle of maintaining citizens’ confidence in the law and the state actions has its own criteria, each of which can be used for the evaluation of regional constitutional justice activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Gulnara R. Khabiboullina* & Liliana I. Bagautdinova, 2018. "The Principle of Maintaining Citizens’ Confidence in Law and State Actions during the Practice of RF Constitutional and Statutory Courts," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 485-488:5.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:485-488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi5.7.485.488.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/5/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:485-488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.