IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p349-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Five Kinds of Translation Platform Comparison Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Liliya F. Nurieva*

    (Kazan Federal University, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Studies, Russia)

  • Svetlana Yu. Glushkova

    (Kazan Federal University, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Studies, Russia)

Abstract

There are many online translation platforms available in China. Through the traffic information published by the Chinese website rankings, this paper selects five online translation platforms featured in this study as a comparative analysis of Google, Baidu, Youdao, Kingsoft and Bing. Google, Baidu and Bing Translation platforms use their powerful search engine features to integrate corpus resources and provide corresponding sources of information. Kingsoft and Youdao Translation platforms are popular universal online dictionaries. This article selects a technical text, compares translations through the five translation platforms, and combines the interface features, functional characteristics and user feedback of the five major translation platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliya F. Nurieva* & Svetlana Yu. Glushkova, 2018. "Five Kinds of Translation Platform Comparison Studies," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 349-351:1.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:349-351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/SPI-1-25-349-351.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/11-2018/1/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:349-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.