IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p260-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency Analysis of Measures to Improve the Labor Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Liliya B. Sungatullina*

    (Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia)

  • Diana V. Neizvestnaya

    (Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia)

  • Ekaterina I. Kadochnikova

    (Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia)

Abstract

The present paper substantiated the need to analyze the implementation of measures to increase the labor productivity in companies in accordance with strategic objectives of businesses. It defined possibilities of using instruments of financial mathematics for the creation of analytical information on changes in the net profit, net present value, discounted payback period, and the profitability index of costs. It considered measures to increase labor productivity within the framework of the lean manufacturing concept. Economic calculations were carried out to determine the effectiveness of introduction of the individual lean production elements in one of the largest Russian oil companies: The introduction of small-scale mechanization and the integration of round checks; and the utilization of the fund standardization and visualization. Practical aspects of determining the effectiveness of measures aimed to increase the labor productivity based on principles of the production. It analyzed the impact of measures to increase the labor productivity on key technical and economic indices of the company’s activity: Increase in the oil production and growth in sales proceeds due to the reduction in downtime, changes in the number of personnel, and reduction in oil losses. The main approaches to the formation of efficiency criteria were identified: The analysis of using labor resources and the evaluation of efficiency of obtaining general income and profits that allowed developing and making managerial decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliya B. Sungatullina* & Diana V. Neizvestnaya & Ekaterina I. Kadochnikova, 2018. "The Efficiency Analysis of Measures to Improve the Labor Productivity," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4, pages 260-266, 11-2018.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:260-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/SPI-1-JSSR18-18-260-266.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/11-2018/1/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Urban Jermann & Vincenzo Quadrini, 2012. "Macroeconomic Effects of Financial Shocks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 238-271, February.
    2. Urban Jermann & Vincenzo Quadrini, 2012. "Erratum: Macroeconomic Effects of Financial Shocks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 1186-1186, April.
    3. Abreu-Ledón, René & Luján-García, Darkys E. & Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Escobar-Pérez, Bernabé, 2018. "A meta-analytic study of the impact of Lean Production on business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 83-102.
    4. Sven-Vegard Buer & Jan Ola Strandhagen & Felix T. S. Chan, 2018. "The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 2924-2940, April.
    5. Yépez, Carlos A., 2017. "Financial conditions and labor productivity over the business cycle," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 34-38.
    6. Hartley, Peter & Medlock III, Kenneth B., 2008. "A model of the operation and development of a National Oil Company," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2459-2485, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvain Catherine & Thomas Chaney & Zongbo Huang & David Sraer & David Thesmar, 2022. "Quantifying Reduced‐Form Evidence on Collateral Constraints," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(4), pages 2143-2181, August.
    2. Liu, Haiying & Liu, Zexiao & Zhang, Chunhong & Li, Tianyu, 2023. "Transformational insurance and green credit incentive policies as financial mechanisms for green energy transitions and low-carbon economic development," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Drenik, Andrés & Perez, Diego J., 2021. "Domestic price dollarization in emerging economies," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 38-55.
    4. Alejandro Torres-García & Carlos A. Ballesteros-Ruiz & Alfredo Villca-Condori, 2020. "Bank procyclicality, business cycles and capital requirements," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 152-169, June.
    5. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5por5bt92h8l0bc7ls4elmcc0b is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Catalina Granda Carvajal, 2015. "Informality and Macroeconomic Volatility: Do Credit Constraints Matter?," Borradores Departamento de Economía 12507, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
    7. Xing Guo, 2020. "Identifying Aggregate Shocks with Micro-level Heterogeneity: Financial Shocks and Investment Fluctuation," Staff Working Papers 20-17, Bank of Canada.
    8. Huang-Meier, Winifred & Freeman, Mark C., 2015. "Aggregate dividends and consumption smoothing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 324-335.
    9. Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas & Thomas Philippon & Dimitri Vayanos, 2017. "The Analytics of the Greek Crisis," NBER Macroeconomics Annual, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 1-81.
    10. Karadi, Peter & Nakov, Anton, 2021. "Effectiveness and addictiveness of quantitative easing," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1096-1117.
    11. Cúrdia, Vasco & Woodford, Michael, 2016. "Credit Frictions and Optimal Monetary Policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 30-65.
    12. Perego, Erica, 2020. "Sovereign risk and asset market dynamics in the euro area," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Andrea Silvestrini & Andrea Zaghini, 2015. "Financial shocks and the real economy in a nonlinear world: a survey of the theoretical and empirical literature," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 255, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    14. Gareis, Johannes & Mayer, Eric, 2020. "Financial shocks and the relative dynamics of tangible and intangible investment: Evidence from the euro area," Discussion Papers 39/2020, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    15. Jeanne, Olivier & Korinek, Anton, 2019. "Managing credit booms and busts: A Pigouvian taxation approach," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 2-17.
    16. Prabheesh, K.P. & Anglingkusumo, Reza & Juhro, Solikin M., 2021. "The dynamics of global financial cycle and domestic economic cycles: Evidence from India and Indonesia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 831-842.
    17. Alessandri, Piergiorgio & Mumtaz, Haroon, 2019. "Financial regimes and uncertainty shocks," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 31-46.
    18. Yépez, Carlos A., 2018. "Financial intermediation and real estate prices impact on business cycles: A Bayesian analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 138-160.
    19. Matthew Rognlie & Andrei Shleifer & Alp Simsek, 2018. "Investment Hangover and the Great Recession," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 113-153, April.
    20. Alam, M. Jahangir, 2020. "Capital misallocation: Cyclicality and sources," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    21. Feng Dong, 2023. "Aggregate Implications of Financial Frictions for Unemployment," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 48, pages 45-71, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:260-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.