Author
Listed:
- Anik Puji Rahayu
(Faculty of Teaching Training and Education, Mulawarman University of East Borneo, Indonesia)
- Lambang Subagiyo
(Faculty of Teaching Training and Education, Mulawarman University of East Borneo, Indonesia)
- Sestuningsih Margi Rahayu
(Faculty of Teaching Training and Education, Mulawarman University of East Borneo, Indonesia)
- Hasbi Sjamsir*
(Faculty of Teaching Training and Education, Mulawarman University of East Borneo, Indonesia)
Abstract
Good university governance is expected to increase the public image which leads to promote credibility and public participation in the role of university. The objectives of this research were to find 16 principles of Good University Governance at Islamic Muhammadiyah University of East Borneo. The quaitative approach with Case study type were used in this research. Key informan is Dean Faculty of health science, Dean secretary and head of study program. The others research Informan are Vice Quality assurance, Vice research and community service insitutes, and Lectures. The data were collected through depth-interview, participation observation, and document study. The data analysis were analyzed with interactive model by Miles and Huberman model. The research finding were : 16 principles of Good University Governance at Islamic Muhammadiyah University of East Borneo. There were nine principles be done optimal have been implemented, namely transparency, fairness, efficiency, effectiveness, win-win situation, responsiveness, performance, productivity and quality culture, however there were seven principles less optimal. The seventh principles which had been implemented less optimally were independence, relevance, accountability, responsibility, performance and academic capacity.
Suggested Citation
Anik Puji Rahayu & Lambang Subagiyo & Sestuningsih Margi Rahayu & Hasbi Sjamsir*, 2018.
"The Principles of Good University Governance at Islamic Muhammadiyah University of East Borneo,"
The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(10), pages 200-204, 10-2018.
Handle:
RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:200-204
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:200-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.