IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/bmerar/2019p33-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget Management and Organizational Effectiveness in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • John Nkeobuna Nnah Ugoani

    (College of Management and Social Sciences, Rhema University, Ab Nigeria)

Abstract

The study examined the relationship between budget management and organizational effectiveness. Budget management is a useful mechanism for enhancing managerial behavior and necessary in motivating managers towards the achievement of organizational objectives. Organizational effectiveness is the reflection of how well resources are used by management that results to productivity and overall profitability. Budget management reinforces planning, coordination, motivation, communication as well as top management action. The exploratory research design was used for the study, and through data analysis, it was found that budget management has positive correlation with organizational effectiveness. The study suggests that management at all levels and times must ensure that deviations from budget are checked to avoid mismanagement and enterprise failure.

Suggested Citation

  • John Nkeobuna Nnah Ugoani, 2019. "Budget Management and Organizational Effectiveness in Nigeria," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 33-39, 02-2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2019:p:33-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/bmer5(2)33-39.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/8/archive/02-2019/2/5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geeta Rana & Renu Rastogi & Pooja Garg, 2016. "Work Values and Its Impact on Managerial Effectiveness: A Relationship Study in Indian Context," Vision, , vol. 20(4), pages 300-311, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2019:p:33-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=8&info=aims .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.