IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/2002922274-279_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The SUCCESS project: The effect of program format and incentives on participation and cessation in worksite smoking cessation programs

Author

Listed:
  • Hennrikus, D.J.
  • Jeffery, R.W.
  • Lando, H.A.
  • Murray, D.M.
  • Brelje, K.
  • Davidann, B.
  • Baxter, J.S.
  • Thai, D.
  • Vessey, J.
  • Liu, J.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined the effect of program format and incentives on participation and cessation in worksite smoking cessation programs. Methods. Twenty-four worksites were randomized to 6 conditions that differed in cessation program format and the use of incentives. Programs were offered for 18 months in each worksite. A total of 2402 cigarette smokers identified at baseline were surveyed 12 and 24 months later to assess participation in programs and cessation. Results. A total of 407 (16.9%) of the smoker cohort registered for programs; on the 12- and 24-month surveys, 15.4% and 19.4% of the cohort, respectively, reported that they had not smoked in the previous 7 days. Registration for programs in incentive sites was almost double that of no-incentive sites (22.4% vs 11.9%), but increased registration did not translate into significantly greater cessation rates. Program type did not affect registration or cessation rates. Conclusions. Although incentives increase rates of registration in worksite smoking cessation programs, they do not appear to increase cessation rates. Phone counseling seems to be at least as effective as group programs for promoting smoking cessation in worksites.

Suggested Citation

  • Hennrikus, D.J. & Jeffery, R.W. & Lando, H.A. & Murray, D.M. & Brelje, K. & Davidann, B. & Baxter, J.S. & Thai, D. & Vessey, J. & Liu, J., 2002. "The SUCCESS project: The effect of program format and incentives on participation and cessation in worksite smoking cessation programs," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(2), pages 274-279.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2002:92:2:274-279_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allan Donner & Neil Klar & Guangyong Zou, 2004. "Methods for the Statistical Analysis of Binary Data in Split-Cluster Designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 919-925, December.
    2. Finkelstein, Eric A. & Bilger, Marcel & Baid, Drishti, 2019. "Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of incentives as a tool for prevention of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 340-350.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2002:92:2:274-279_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.