IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/200292164-70_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City

Author

Listed:
  • Merkin, S.S.
  • Stevenson, L.
  • Powe, N.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined the association between a residential area's socioeconomic status (SES), race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City. Methods. The cross-sectional study design used breast cancer information for 37 921 cases diagnosed in New York City from 1986 to 1995. Residential education and income levels were based on the 1990 census and ascribed to each case by zip code. Associations between race, area SES, and advanced-stage breast cancer stage, and the interaction between race and SES, were evaluated in bivariate and multivariate analyses. Results. After adjusting for age and year at diagnosis, living in areas with lower levels of education and income increased the odds of presenting with advanced-stage breast cancer by 50% for Black women and by 75% for White women. No significant qualitative interaction was present between area SES and race. Conclusions. This study confirmed independent racial and socioeconomic differences in the risk of advanced-stage breast cancer in a large and diverse population. The results emphasize the need to improve screening practices and clinical treatment in both high-risk populations and high-risk geographic areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Merkin, S.S. & Stevenson, L. & Powe, N., 2002. "Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(1), pages 64-70.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2002:92:1:64-70_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dean, Lorraine & Subramanian, S.V. & Williams, David R. & Armstrong, Katrina & Charles, Camille Zubrinsky & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2014. "The role of social capital in African–American women's use of mammography," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 148-156.
    2. Haynes, Robin & Pearce, Jamie & Barnett, Ross, 2008. "Cancer survival in New Zealand: Ethnic, social and geographical inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 928-937, September.
    3. Wen, Ming & Cagney, Kathleen A. & Christakis, Nicholas A., 2005. "Effect of specific aspects of community social environment on the mortality of Individuals diagnosed with serious illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1119-1134, September.
    4. Ming Wen & Christopher R. Browning & Kathleen A. Cagney, 2007. "Neighbourhood Deprivation, Social Capital and Regular Exercise during Adulthood: A Multilevel Study in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(13), pages 2651-2671, December.
    5. Lung-Chang Chien & Anjali D Deshpande & Donna B Jeffe & Mario Schootman, 2012. "Influence of Primary Care Physician Availability and Socioeconomic Deprivation on Breast Cancer from 1988 to 2008: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Sara McLafferty & Fahui Wang & Lan Luo & Jared Butler, 2011. "Rural — Urban Inequalities in Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Spatial and Social Dimensions of Risk and Access," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(4), pages 726-740, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2002:92:1:64-70_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.