IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/200292149-52_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lack of oral health care for adults in Harlem: A hidden crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Zabos, G.P.
  • Northridge, M.E.
  • Ro, M.J.
  • Trinh, C.
  • Vaughan, R.
  • Howard, J.M.
  • Lamster, I.
  • Bassett, M.T.
  • Cohall, A.T.

Abstract

Objectives. Profound and growing disparities exist in oral health among certain US populations. We sought here to determine the prevalence of oral health complaints among Harlem adults by measures of social class, as well as their access to oral health care. Methods. A population-based survey of adults in Central Harlem was conducted from 1992 to 1994. Two questions on oral health were included: whether participants had experienced problems with their teeth or gums during the past 12 months and, if so, whether they had seen a dentist. Results. Of 50 health conditions queried about, problems with teeth or gums were the chief complaint among participants (30%). Those more likely to report oral health problems than other participants had annual household incomes of less than $9000 (36%), were unemployed (34%), and lacked health insurance (34%). The privately insured were almost twice as likely to have seen a dentist for oral health problems (87%) than were the uninsured (48%). Conclusions. There is an urgent need to provide oral health services for adults in Harlem. Integrating oral health into comprehensive primary care is one promising mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Zabos, G.P. & Northridge, M.E. & Ro, M.J. & Trinh, C. & Vaughan, R. & Howard, J.M. & Lamster, I. & Bassett, M.T. & Cohall, A.T., 2002. "Lack of oral health care for adults in Harlem: A hidden crisis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(1), pages 49-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2002:92:1:49-52_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2002:92:1:49-52_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.