IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/200292101653-1656_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health status of people using complementary and alternative medical practitioner services in 4 english counties

Author

Listed:
  • Ong, C.-K.
  • Petersen, S.
  • Bodeker, G.C.
  • Stewart-Brown, S.

Abstract

Objectives. This study was undertaken to establish the health status of users of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) services in England. Methods. A postal questionnaire (response rate: 64%) covering long-standing illness, use of conventional medical and CAM services, and the United Kingdom Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was sent to more than 14000 adults in 4 counties. Results. Sixty percent of CAM users reported having a chronic illness or disability; back pain and bowel problems were the conditions most commonly reported. Regardless of whether chronic illness was reported, CAM users reported poorer health than nonusers, particularly in the dimensions of pain and physical disability, and made more visits to general practitioners. Conclusions. In England, users of CAM services have poorer physical health than nonusers and make more frequent use of conventional medical services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ong, C.-K. & Petersen, S. & Bodeker, G.C. & Stewart-Brown, S., 2002. "Health status of people using complementary and alternative medical practitioner services in 4 english counties," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(10), pages 1653-1656.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2002:92:10:1653-1656_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2002:92:10:1653-1656_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.