IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/200191155-61_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Targeted mailed materials and the medicare beneficiary: Increasing mammogram screening among the elderly

Author

Listed:
  • Fox, S.A.
  • Stein, J.A.
  • Sockloskie, R.J.
  • Ory, M.G.

Abstract

Objectives. Older women have the highest breast cancer rates but are underscreened relative to their risk. Racial/ethnic minority women especially have low screening rates, often because of financial constraints. In response, Medicare introduced subsidized biennial mammogram benefits in 1991. This study examined the effect on mammography rates of an intervention that informed women about the Medicare benefit. Methods. A list frame method of subject selection was used to select random samples of eligible women from the Health Care Financing Administration's master beneficiary file. Women were interviewed by telephone in 1991 (N=917) before the targeted mailing and in 1993 (N=922). One control and 2 treatment communities participated. Results. Mammogram use increased significantly among minorities in the treatment groups. Among minorities who received the intervention, Black women were twice as likely (odds ratio=1.97) and Hispanic women were more than twice as likely (odds ratio=2.33) to undergo screening relative to their untreated cohorts. Conclusions. A targeted low-cost mailed intervention can help increase screening rates among elderly minority women. The Health Care Financing Administration should promote its benefits aggressively if it expects to reach its target - elderly beneficiaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Fox, S.A. & Stein, J.A. & Sockloskie, R.J. & Ory, M.G., 2001. "Targeted mailed materials and the medicare beneficiary: Increasing mammogram screening among the elderly," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(1), pages 55-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2001:91:1:55-61_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2001:91:1:55-61_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.