IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/2000906880_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating a community report card: The San Diego experience

Author

Listed:
  • Simmes, D.R.
  • Blaszcak, M.R.
  • Kurtin, P.S.
  • Bowen, N.L.
  • Ross, R.K.

Abstract

San Diego County population is the second largest in California and the fourth largest in the United States. The 2.7 million people of this large and heterogeneous area represent diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds and present many challenges to those providing public health and social services. Recent changes - welfare reform, the movement of Medicard to managed care, and restructuring of the county's Health and Human Services Agency - further challenge the ability to improve outcomes for children and families. The Country Board of Supervisors and the members of the community wanted to know what impact these changes might be having on the health and well-being of children and families. The board ordered the development of a monitoring system, and in response, the San Diego County Child and Family Health and Well-Being Report Card was created to monitor community-level outcomes. Community report cards provide a snapshot of the overall health and well- being of a community through the use of indicators or measurements of local trends. Such reports are used increasingly across the United States to bring critical information to community members, service groups, and policymakers. A national directory of such report cards has recently been released and is described elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • Simmes, D.R. & Blaszcak, M.R. & Kurtin, P.S. & Bowen, N.L. & Ross, R.K., 2000. "Creating a community report card: The San Diego experience," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(6), pages 880-880.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2000:90:6:880_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2000:90:6:880_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.