IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/2000905799-803_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: Socioeconomic gradients persist

Author

Listed:
  • Katz, S.J.
  • Zemencuk, J.K.
  • Hofer, T.P.

Abstract

Objectives. This study compared rates of annual mammography screening across socioeconomic status between the United States and Canada in 1994. Methods. Population-based cross-sectional surveys were used to compare the rates. Results. Screening rates were higher in the United States than in Canada for women aged 50 to 69 years (47.3% vs 38.8%, P

Suggested Citation

  • Katz, S.J. & Zemencuk, J.K. & Hofer, T.P., 2000. "Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: Socioeconomic gradients persist," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(5), pages 799-803.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2000:90:5:799-803_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Ted McDonald & Angela Sherman, 2008. "Determinants of Mammography Usage across Rural and Urban Regions of Canada," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 238, McMaster University.
    2. Sundmacher, Leonie & Busse, Reinhard, 2011. "The impact of physician supply on avoidable cancer deaths in Germany. A spatial analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 53-62.
    3. Matheson, Flora I. & Moineddin, Rahim & Dunn, James R. & Creatore, Maria Isabella & Gozdyra, Piotr & Glazier, Richard H., 2006. "Urban neighborhoods, chronic stress, gender and depression," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(10), pages 2604-2616, November.
    4. Malin Kjellén & My Euler-Chelpin, 2010. "Socioeconomic status as determinant for participation in mammography screening: assessing the difference between using women’s own versus their partner’s," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(3), pages 209-215, June.
    5. Thomas C. Buchmueller & Léontine Goldzahl, 2018. "The effect of organized breast cancer screening on mammography use: Evidence from France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(12), pages 1963-1980, December.
    6. Thomas C. Buchmueller & Léontine Goldzahl, 2018. "The Effect of Organized Breast Cancer Screening on Mammography Use: Evidence from France," NBER Working Papers 24316, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2000:90:5:799-803_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.