IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1999893369-373_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What's driving an epidemic? The spread of syphilis along an Interstate Highway in rural North Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Cook, R.L.
  • Royce, R.A.
  • Thomas, J.C.
  • Hanusa, B.H.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine whether county syphilis rates were increased along Interstate Highway 95 (I-95) in North Carolina during a recent epidemic. Methods. Ecological data on syphilis cases, demographic data, highway data, and drag activity data were used to conduct a cross-sectional and longitudinal study of North Carolina counties from 1985 to 1994. Crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were determined by means of standard and longitudinal Poisson regression models adjusted for sociodemographic factors and drag use. Results. Ten-year syphilis rates in I-95 counties greatly exceeded rates in non-I-95 counties (38 vs 16 cases per 100 000 persons) and remained higher after adjustment for race, age, sex, poverty, large cities, and drug activity (adjusted IRR = 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.84, 2.28). Syphilis rates were stable until 1989, when rates increased sharply in I-95 counties but remained stable in non-I-95 counties. Increased drag activity in I-95 counties preceded the rise in syphilis cases. Conclusions. A better understanding of the relationship between highways and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases may guide future prevention interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cook, R.L. & Royce, R.A. & Thomas, J.C. & Hanusa, B.H., 1999. "What's driving an epidemic? The spread of syphilis along an Interstate Highway in rural North Carolina," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(3), pages 369-373.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:3:369-373_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:3:369-373_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.