IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1999893364-368_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines and persistence of disease in disadvantaged populations

Author

Listed:
  • Jafari, H.S.
  • Adams, W.G.
  • Robinson, K.A.
  • Plikaytis, B.D.
  • Wenger, J.D.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccines among children aged 2 to 18 months and to determine risk factors for invasive Hib disease during a period of declining incidence (1991-1994). Methods. A prospective population-based case-control study was conducted in a multisate US population of 15.5 million. A laboratory-based active surveillance system was used for case detection. Results. In a multivariate analysis, having a single-parent mother (odds ratio [OR]=4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.2, 14.8) and household crowding (OR=3.5, 95% CI=1.03, 11.7) were risk factors for Hib disease independent of vaccination status. After adjustment for these risk factors, the protective efficacy of 2 or more Hib vaccine doses was 86% (95% CI=16%, 98%). Among undervaccinated subjects, living with a smoker (P=.02) and several indicators of lower socioeconomic status were risk factors for Hib disease. Conclusions. Hib disease still occurs at low levels in the United States, predominantly in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Low immunization coverage may facilitate continuing transmission of Hib. Special efforts to achieve complete and timely immunization in disadvantaged populations are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jafari, H.S. & Adams, W.G. & Robinson, K.A. & Plikaytis, B.D. & Wenger, J.D., 1999. "Efficacy of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines and persistence of disease in disadvantaged populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(3), pages 364-368.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:3:364-368_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:3:364-368_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.