IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1999893322-329_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is whole grain intake associated with reduced total and cause-specific death rates in older women? The Iowa women's health study

Author

Listed:
  • Jacobs Jr., D.R.
  • Meyer, K.A.
  • Kushi, L.H.
  • Folsom, A.R.

Abstract

Objectives. This study sought to determine whether nutrient-rich whole grains reduce mortality risk. Methods. The study included 38 740 Iowa women, aged 55 to 69 years. A food frequency questionnaire was used to obtain data on grain intake. Results. Median whole grain intake quintiles ranged from a median of 0.2 to more than 3 servings per day. Women with higher intakes had healthier lifestyles and less baseline disease. The total death rate decreased in increasing quintiles, and the pattern repeated for cancer, cardiovascular disease, and and other causes combined. Adjusted for lifestyle and baseline disease, the relative hazard rate ratio for total death was about 0.85 in daily consumers of whole grain. Findings persisted in strata of baseline healthy and diseased and were not explained by dietary fiber. Rates of total mortality, but not cardiovascular disease mortality, were higher among frequent consumers of refined grain. Conclusions. Total mortality risk was inversely associated with whole grain intake and positively associated with refined grain intake. Refined grains contributed more than 20% of energy intake, and whole grains contributed 1%. Substitution of whole for refined grain may reduce chronic disease risk in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacobs Jr., D.R. & Meyer, K.A. & Kushi, L.H. & Folsom, A.R., 1999. "Is whole grain intake associated with reduced total and cause-specific death rates in older women? The Iowa women's health study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(3), pages 322-329.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:3:322-329_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:3:322-329_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.