IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1999892164-170_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of state policies and programs in buffering the effects of poverty on children's immunization receipt

Author

Listed:
  • Mayer, M.L.
  • Clark, S.J.
  • Konrad, T.R.
  • Freeman, V.A.
  • Slifkin, R.T.

Abstract

Objectives. This study assessed the influence of public policies on the immunization status of 2-year-old children in the United States. Methods. Up- to-dateness for the primary immunization series was assessed in a national sample of 8100 children from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey and its 1991 Longitudinal Follow-Up. Results. Documented immunization rates of this sample were 33% for poor children and 44% for others. More widespread Medicaid coverage was associated with greater likelihood of up- to-dateness among poor children. Up-to-dateness was more likely for poor children with public rather than private sources of routine pediatric care, but all children living in states where most immunizations were delivered in the public sector were less likely to be up to date. Poor children in states with partial vaccine replacement programs were less likely to be up to date than those in free-market purchase states. Conclusions. While state policies can enhance immunization delivery for poor children, heavy reliance on public sector immunization does not ensure timely receipt of vaccines. Public- and private-sector collaboration is necessary to protect children from vaccine- preventable diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayer, M.L. & Clark, S.J. & Konrad, T.R. & Freeman, V.A. & Slifkin, R.T., 1999. "The role of state policies and programs in buffering the effects of poverty on children's immunization receipt," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(2), pages 164-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:2:164-170_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:2:164-170_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.