IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199989131-35_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consequences in Georgia of a nationwide outbreak of Salmonella infections: What you don't know might hurt you

Author

Listed:
  • Mahon, B.E.
  • Slutsker, L.
  • Hutwagner, L.
  • Drenzek, C.
  • Maloney, K.
  • Toomey, K.
  • Griffin, P.M.

Abstract

Objectives. This study assessed the impact in Georgia of a nationwide salmonellosis outbreak caused by ice cream products and the effectiveness of the subsequent warning against eating the implicated products. Methods. A telephone survey of 250 randomly selected Georgia customers of the ice cream producer was conducted 13 to 17 days after the warning. Results. Respondents from 179 households representing 628 persons were interviewed. The median date of first hearing the warning was 5 days after it was issued, and 16 respondents (9%) had not heard it. Among those who had heard the warning, 42 (26%) did not initially believe the products were unsafe. In 22 (31%) of the 72 households that had the implicated ice cream when the respondent heard the warning, someone subsequently ate the ice cream. Diarrhea was reported in 26% (121/463) of persons who had eaten the products but in only 5% (8/152) who had not (odds ratio [controlling for household clustering] = 3.8; 95% confidence interval = 2.0, 7.5). We estimate this outbreak caused 11 000 cases of diarrhea in Georgia, 1760 (16%) with exposure after the warning. Conclusions. A large outbreak occurred in Georgia, much of which might have been prevented by a more timely and convincing warning.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahon, B.E. & Slutsker, L. & Hutwagner, L. & Drenzek, C. & Maloney, K. & Toomey, K. & Griffin, P.M., 1999. "Consequences in Georgia of a nationwide outbreak of Salmonella infections: What you don't know might hurt you," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(1), pages 31-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:1:31-35_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:1:31-35_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.