IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1998882239-244_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying condom users at risk for breakage and slippage: Findings from three international sites

Author

Listed:
  • Spruyt, A.
  • Steiner, M.J.
  • Joanis, C.
  • Glover, L.H.
  • Piedrahita, C.
  • Alvarado, G.
  • Ramos, R.
  • Maglaya, C.
  • Cordero, M.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined whether past condom failure (breakage, slippage, or both) can predict future failure and evaluated other predictors of condom failure. Methods. At each of 3 international sites, approximately 130 male condom users were enrolled and given 5 condoms to use for vaginal intercourse over a 3-week period. Results. Men at increased risk (history of 1 or more condoms that broke or slipped off) reported approximately twice as many condom failures as those not in this group. Condom failure increased with the number of adverse condom use behaviors reported per participant. Opening condom packages with sharp objects and unrolling condoms before donning were associated with breakage. Unrolling condoms before donning and lengthy or intense intercourse were associated with slippage. Of background characteristics evaluated, having less education was associated with condom failure. Conclusions. These data suggest that a history of condom failure predicts future failure, a finding that may be used for targeted intervention. Moreover, these data provide further evidence that certain behaviors and lower educational attainment are associated with condom failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Spruyt, A. & Steiner, M.J. & Joanis, C. & Glover, L.H. & Piedrahita, C. & Alvarado, G. & Ramos, R. & Maglaya, C. & Cordero, M., 1998. "Identifying condom users at risk for breakage and slippage: Findings from three international sites," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(2), pages 239-244.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:2:239-244_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:2:239-244_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.