IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19978791535-1538_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening women for gonorrhea: Demographic screening criteria for general clinical use

Author

Listed:
  • Mertz, K.J.
  • Levine, W.C.
  • Mosure, D.J.
  • Berman, S.M.
  • Dorian, K.J.
  • Hadgu, A.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this analysis was to derive potential gonorrhea screening criteria for women. Methods. Data corresponding to 44366 gonorrhea cultures from women 15 through 44 years of age in Columbus, Ohio, were analyzed. Results. Characteristics that were associated with gonococcal infection and were suitable for screening decisions included patient's age and marital status and previous prevalence of gonorrhea at provider site. Probabilities of infection ranged from .001 for married women 25 through 44 years of age at low-prevalence provider sites to .078 for unmarried women 15 through 19 years of age at high-prevalence sites. Conclusions. Patient's age and marital status and prevalence of gonorrhea at provider site can be used as indicators to ensure testing of high-prevalence groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Mertz, K.J. & Levine, W.C. & Mosure, D.J. & Berman, S.M. & Dorian, K.J. & Hadgu, A., 1997. "Screening women for gonorrhea: Demographic screening criteria for general clinical use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(9), pages 1535-1538.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:9:1535-1538_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:9:1535-1538_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.