IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19978771107-1112_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National health care reform and the 103rd Congress: The activities and influence of public health advocates

Author

Listed:
  • Schauffler, H.H.
  • Wilkerson, J.

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the activities and influence of public health interest groups and coalitions on the national health care reform debates in the 103rd Congress. Methods: Congressional staff and representatives of public health interest groups, coalitions, and government health agencies were interviewed. Content analysis of eight leading national health care reform bills was performed. Results: The public health community coalesced around public health in health care reform; nearly all the major interest groups and government health agencies joined two or more public health or prevention coalitions, and half joined three or more. The most effective influence on health care reform legislation was early, sustained personal contact with Congress members and their staffs, accompanied by succinct written materials summarizing key points. Media campaigns and grassroots mobilization were less effective. Seven of the eight leading health care reform bills included one or more of the priorities supported by public health advocates. Conclusions: The public health community played an important role in increasing awareness and support for public health programs in the health care reform bills of the 103rd Congress.

Suggested Citation

  • Schauffler, H.H. & Wilkerson, J., 1997. "National health care reform and the 103rd Congress: The activities and influence of public health advocates," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(7), pages 1107-1112.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:7:1107-1112_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:7:1107-1112_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.