IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1997876998-1002_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining injury at work on the california death certificate

Author

Listed:
  • Peek-Asa, C.
  • McArthur, D.L.
  • Kraus, J.F.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined decisions of California County Coroner's offices in determining injury at work and identified factors influencing this decision. Methods. Surveys were sent to California County Coroner's offices (response rate = 93%). The survey included 23 vignettes that required the respondent to determine whether the fatality involved an injury at work. The Rasch method was used to determine internal consistency in endorsing vignettes and to determine overall endorsability of vignettes based on underlying factors. Results. Respondents showed internal consistency but much disagreement in their endorsement of vignettes. Decedents who were performing paid work or were on their work site during working hours were almost unanimously endorsed as having incurred an injury at work. Nonpayment, travel/transportation, suicide, and nontraditional work sites and work hours led to disagreement and uncertainty among respondents. Conclusions. Coroners have different methods of determining injury at work on the death certificate, and available guidelines do not define many of the ambiguous situations encountered by coroners.

Suggested Citation

  • Peek-Asa, C. & McArthur, D.L. & Kraus, J.F., 1997. "Determining injury at work on the california death certificate," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(6), pages 998-1002.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:6:998-1002_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corinne Peek-Asa & Ling Zhang & Cara Hamann & Jonathan Davis & Laura Schwab-Reese, 2021. "Characteristics and Circumstances Associated with Work-Related Suicides from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Marizen Ramirez & Ronald Bedford & Ryan Sullivan & T. Renee Anthony & John Kraemer & Brett Faine & Corinne Peek-Asa, 2013. "Toxicology Testing in Fatally Injured Workers: A Review of Five Years of Iowa FACE Cases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:6:998-1002_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.