IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1997874676-680_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and heart disease risk factors in older women

Author

Listed:
  • Kritz-Silverstein, D.
  • Barrett-Connor, E.
  • Wingard, D.L.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined the relation of hysterectomy and oophorectomy to heart disease risk factors. Methods. Data were collected and analyzed for 1150 women aged 50 through 89. Results. Of these women, 21.8% reported hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy; 22.1%, hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Compared with women without hysterectomy, oophorectomized women, especially those 20 or more years post-menopause, had increased lipids, lipoproteins, glucose, and insulin; blood pressures were increased among current estrogen users. Women with hysterectomies with ovarian conservation had similar or more favorable risk factors than nonhysterectomized women. Conclusions. Bilateral oophorectomy, but not hysterectomy, may have long-term negative consequences for heart disease risk factors not totally ameliorated by estrogen use.

Suggested Citation

  • Kritz-Silverstein, D. & Barrett-Connor, E. & Wingard, D.L., 1997. "Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and heart disease risk factors in older women," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(4), pages 676-680.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:4:676-680_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:4:676-680_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.