IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1997874623-628_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low blood pressure and five-year mortality in a Stockholm cohort of the very old: Possible confounding by cognitive impairment and other factors

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Z.
  • Viitanen, M.
  • Winblad, B.

Abstract

Objectives. Low blood pressure has often been reported to be related to excess mortality in people over the age of 75 years. This study examined whether other predictors may account for the association. Methods. A community-based cohort of 1810 people who were aged 75 years and older was followed for 5 years. Results. The relative risk of death was 1.39 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 1.73) for people with systolic pressure lower than 130 mm Hg and 1.21 (95% CI = 1.02, 1.43) for those with diastolic pressure lower than 75 mm Hg, compared with corresponding reference groups, when all other variables were simultaneously considered in Cox proportional hazards models. The observed association was present mainly in subjects with at least two of the three conditions (cardiovascular disease, limitation in activities of daily living, or cognitive impairment). The effect of low diastolic pressure on mortality was also significant in those with only cognitive impairment. Conclusions. Preexisting cardiovascular disease, limitation in activities of dally living, and, more important, cognitive impairment may be responsible for the association of low blood pressure with increased mortality in the very old in that they cause both reductions in blood pressure and excess deaths.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Z. & Viitanen, M. & Winblad, B., 1997. "Low blood pressure and five-year mortality in a Stockholm cohort of the very old: Possible confounding by cognitive impairment and other factors," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(4), pages 623-628.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:4:623-628_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:4:623-628_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.