IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199787121967-1970_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of nutrition education for hypercholesterolemic children

Author

Listed:
  • Brannon, S.D.
  • Tershakovec, A.M.
  • Shannon, B.M.

Abstract

Objectives. This study compared the cost-effectiveness, from the family's perspective, of a parent-child auto-tutorial nutrition education program with that of counseling by a dietitian after identification of hypercholesterolemic children in pediatric offices. Methods. Personnel, parent time, equipment, and laboratory costs associated with the interventions were analyzed. Reductions in dietary fat as a percentage of total calories were analyzed by means of 24-hour dietary recalls and in plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 3 and 12 months postintervention. Results. Average costs totaled $208.08 for the parent- child auto-tutorial program and $213.28 for counseling. While the parent- child program was somewhat less cost-effective in terms of dietary change, it was more cost-effective in terms of lipid reduction at 3 months, although this advantage disappeared by 12 months. Conclusions. Modest reductions in fat in the diet and in plasma lipid levels were achieved at costs that also appear modest in comparison with treatment of elevated cholesterol in adulthood. Follow-up interventions may be needed to sustain effects, while longitudinal studies are needed to assess the long-term cost benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Brannon, S.D. & Tershakovec, A.M. & Shannon, B.M., 1997. "The cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of nutrition education for hypercholesterolemic children," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(12), pages 1967-1970.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:12:1967-1970_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:12:1967-1970_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.